<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Al Clarke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alclarke.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alclarke.com</link>
	<description>Let&#039;s make it work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FairFuel UK – this year’s most effective comms programme? by Scott Gibson</title>
		<link>http://www.alclarke.com/2011/09/fairfuel-uk-%e2%80%93-this-year%e2%80%99s-most-effective-comms-programme/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alclarke.com/?p=249#comment-40</guid>
		<description>One fundamental requirement is to win over not only politicians but also the environmental lobby.  Fair Fuel needs to persuade them to depart from the flawed assumption that lower fuel prices will lead people purchsing vehicles which are less fuel efficient, driving more and generating more traffic.  As Fairfuel rightly suggests reducing petrol prices will put more money back in peoples pockets to spend and support the economy.  If the government wish people to drive more efficient vehicles, then efficiency standards for new vehicles is a more effective tool than the Fuel Duty Escalator, which we all know is a flawed unsustainable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One fundamental requirement is to win over not only politicians but also the environmental lobby.  Fair Fuel needs to persuade them to depart from the flawed assumption that lower fuel prices will lead people purchsing vehicles which are less fuel efficient, driving more and generating more traffic.  As Fairfuel rightly suggests reducing petrol prices will put more money back in peoples pockets to spend and support the economy.  If the government wish people to drive more efficient vehicles, then efficiency standards for new vehicles is a more effective tool than the Fuel Duty Escalator, which we all know is a flawed unsustainable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FairFuel UK – this year’s most effective comms programme? by Howard Cox (FFUK)</title>
		<link>http://www.alclarke.com/2011/09/fairfuel-uk-%e2%80%93-this-year%e2%80%99s-most-effective-comms-programme/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Cox (FFUK)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alclarke.com/?p=249#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the compliments. Its been a slog but we will never give up until the Gov see&#039;s sense in motivating the economy not crushing it with high fuel duty. Keep signing up at http://bit.ly/FFUK-Gov  and download the prospectus at http://www.fairfueluk.com/prospectus.html. We have to win this one!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the compliments. Its been a slog but we will never give up until the Gov see&#8217;s sense in motivating the economy not crushing it with high fuel duty. Keep signing up at <a href="http://bit.ly/FFUK-Gov" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/FFUK-Gov</a>  and download the prospectus at <a href="http://www.fairfueluk.com/prospectus.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fairfueluk.com/prospectus.html</a>. We have to win this one!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Make Your Anniversary Count by Twitted by ProPhotography</title>
		<link>http://www.alclarke.com/2011/08/make-your-anniversary-count/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by ProPhotography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alclarke.com/?p=216#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by ProPhotography [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by ProPhotography [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apes to Apps &#8211; the 4 ages of social media by Charles Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.alclarke.com/2011/06/apes-to-apps-the-4-ages-of-social-media/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alclarke.com/?p=191#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Hi Al

An interesting subject indeed and also interesting to see how the Management of Social Media will evolve over the next few years, with many Companies and Organisations still failing to constructively engage with Social Media.

Your &#039;Four Step to Social Media Management&#039; of Review, Objective, Team Build &amp; Measure make a lot of sense and I do hope that these fundamental management protocols are beginning to be applied in business as the engagement with Social Media is indeed an opportunity not to be missed.

Best wishes

Charles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Al</p>
<p>An interesting subject indeed and also interesting to see how the Management of Social Media will evolve over the next few years, with many Companies and Organisations still failing to constructively engage with Social Media.</p>
<p>Your &#8216;Four Step to Social Media Management&#8217; of Review, Objective, Team Build &amp; Measure make a lot of sense and I do hope that these fundamental management protocols are beginning to be applied in business as the engagement with Social Media is indeed an opportunity not to be missed.</p>
<p>Best wishes</p>
<p>Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twibel. How Twitter could cost you a fortune. by Les Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://www.alclarke.com/2011/03/twibel-how-twitter-could-cost-you-a-fortune/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alclarke.com/?p=87#comment-16</guid>
		<description>The advice is spot on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The advice is spot on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twibel. How Twitter could cost you a fortune. by Al Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.alclarke.com/2011/03/twibel-how-twitter-could-cost-you-a-fortune/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alclarke.com/?p=87#comment-7</guid>
		<description>And now it has started in the UK. Since I wrote the blog last week, we now have news of the UK&#039;s first Twibel. Follow this link it takes you to a report from Media Digest (a very useful free weekly aggregator of information) - visit http://bit.ly/g2JIQI

As a marketing advisor I have seen first-hand the parallel world of communication in corporate life, and it looks like this: 

World 1 - Businesses sign off every press release, dot every &#039;i&#039; and cross every &#039;t&#039; in brochures, letters and communication materials. Drafts and re-drafts are common until everyone is happy. Meetings are held where strategies emerge to ensure brand consistency and tone of voice. Brand guidelines and communication protocols = control.  
 
World 2 - A free-for-all where staff tweet, blog, and have an open dialogue on social networks. Employees tell the world about products, issues and services often before the planned corporate releases commenting on business and customer activity and in many cases  in a style that does not resemble their employers&#039; tone  = anarchy

World 1 and World 2 are going on simultaneously in many businesses right now.

So, Diana, you’re absolutely right - there will be (expensive and chargeable) late nights in Legal Chambers and probably many new hires in the legal profession - until businesses get to grips with the basic challenge, which is: managing the issue.

How many of the main board directors in a business can explain what social media is? Very few. And how many know what is happening around their brand in social media? Even less.

Martin Derrick makes the point that we need protection of both brand and individual against a tide of untruths - I agree. 

But, managers need to manage and businesses can do a lot to avoid the risks and capitalise on the opportunities by recognising what&#039;s happening and developing a clear and measurable plan for social media. 

Social media is not rocket science. After 25 years in business, I’ve made the time and  managed to grasp it and harness the benefits whilst recognising the risks. 

The biggest challenge is time. Few leaders in business take the time to learn and engage with social media – but until they do, the risks are stacking up.  

You might be interested to follow @socialmedialaw1 for a legal view, and Media Digest @mediadigestUK who track media news and keep you up to date.  (note I have no business interest in either party – I just follow their updates) 

If you want to explore how your business can tackle the issues – get in touch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now it has started in the UK. Since I wrote the blog last week, we now have news of the UK&#8217;s first Twibel. Follow this link it takes you to a report from Media Digest (a very useful free weekly aggregator of information) &#8211; visit <a href="http://bit.ly/g2JIQI" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/g2JIQI</a></p>
<p>As a marketing advisor I have seen first-hand the parallel world of communication in corporate life, and it looks like this: </p>
<p>World 1 &#8211; Businesses sign off every press release, dot every &#8216;i&#8217; and cross every &#8216;t&#8217; in brochures, letters and communication materials. Drafts and re-drafts are common until everyone is happy. Meetings are held where strategies emerge to ensure brand consistency and tone of voice. Brand guidelines and communication protocols = control.  </p>
<p>World 2 &#8211; A free-for-all where staff tweet, blog, and have an open dialogue on social networks. Employees tell the world about products, issues and services often before the planned corporate releases commenting on business and customer activity and in many cases  in a style that does not resemble their employers&#8217; tone  = anarchy</p>
<p>World 1 and World 2 are going on simultaneously in many businesses right now.</p>
<p>So, Diana, you’re absolutely right &#8211; there will be (expensive and chargeable) late nights in Legal Chambers and probably many new hires in the legal profession &#8211; until businesses get to grips with the basic challenge, which is: managing the issue.</p>
<p>How many of the main board directors in a business can explain what social media is? Very few. And how many know what is happening around their brand in social media? Even less.</p>
<p>Martin Derrick makes the point that we need protection of both brand and individual against a tide of untruths &#8211; I agree. </p>
<p>But, managers need to manage and businesses can do a lot to avoid the risks and capitalise on the opportunities by recognising what&#8217;s happening and developing a clear and measurable plan for social media. </p>
<p>Social media is not rocket science. After 25 years in business, I’ve made the time and  managed to grasp it and harness the benefits whilst recognising the risks. </p>
<p>The biggest challenge is time. Few leaders in business take the time to learn and engage with social media – but until they do, the risks are stacking up.  </p>
<p>You might be interested to follow @socialmedialaw1 for a legal view, and Media Digest @mediadigestUK who track media news and keep you up to date.  (note I have no business interest in either party – I just follow their updates) </p>
<p>If you want to explore how your business can tackle the issues – get in touch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twibel. How Twitter could cost you a fortune. by Diana Soltmann</title>
		<link>http://www.alclarke.com/2011/03/twibel-how-twitter-could-cost-you-a-fortune/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Soltmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alclarke.com/?p=87#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with the suggestion that the libel laws need to be revisited and it would be good to have a short version to refer to. However it does worry me that here is another reason why businesses will be even less transparent. It seems to me that this legislation just means that vast teams of lawyers will be even more busy monitoring social media in addition to every utterance that corporates make. More incentive for businesses to make the usual &#039;no comment&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with the suggestion that the libel laws need to be revisited and it would be good to have a short version to refer to. However it does worry me that here is another reason why businesses will be even less transparent. It seems to me that this legislation just means that vast teams of lawyers will be even more busy monitoring social media in addition to every utterance that corporates make. More incentive for businesses to make the usual &#8216;no comment&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twibel. How Twitter could cost you a fortune. by Martin Derrick</title>
		<link>http://www.alclarke.com/2011/03/twibel-how-twitter-could-cost-you-a-fortune/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alclarke.com/?p=87#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure this is a timely warning ... but not one which will be heeded by all, judging by the only comment left at the bottom of that Daily Mail article, which ignores the substance of the article and refers only to  Courteney Love&#039;s personal appearance. It&#039;s also a worry that those &quot;freedom of expression&quot; groups  completely miss the point in warning that the law is being used to ‘stifle online communication through unsuited legislation’. It&#039;s not. The law is simply being used to prevent unfettered lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure this is a timely warning &#8230; but not one which will be heeded by all, judging by the only comment left at the bottom of that Daily Mail article, which ignores the substance of the article and refers only to  Courteney Love&#8217;s personal appearance. It&#8217;s also a worry that those &#8220;freedom of expression&#8221; groups  completely miss the point in warning that the law is being used to ‘stifle online communication through unsuited legislation’. It&#8217;s not. The law is simply being used to prevent unfettered lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Media – a tale of the pub, Donald Rumsfeld and the Mexican Wave… by alclarkeltd</title>
		<link>http://www.alclarke.com/2010/03/social-media-%e2%80%93-a-tale-of-the-pub-donald-rumsfeld-and-the-mexican-wave/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>alclarkeltd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alclarkeltd.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Thanks Peter Pan - all the various applications you mentioned are variants of the same channel. Take the analogy with traditional media, then perhaps Twitter is a postcard, LinkedIn is a memo or business card, Facebook your photo album or social diary and blogging is writing a letter or a book...

I would say that it&#039;s never too late to get started, the challenge is where to begin! It must be pretty confusing to jump straight in to social media today without a guide to help. Tools like Tweet Deck can help you keep track, but where do you start - and what are you trying to achieve by starting off?

The business applications for social media, in my opinion, have yet to be fully explored, understood and the protocols established and whilst they are in this period of development, millions of people are using it and their views influence others in making choices about all kinds of things from politics to product choice.

Seems to me that until a brand or organisation has a real understanding of what&#039;s being said in these conversations that they&#039;re ignoring a significant and growing part of their customer base.

In the motor industry the world&#039;s number two company General Motors has now devoted considerable resource in this area http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-keeping-customers-happy-through-social-media-monitoring.html

Social media is a free-form, open space. How you behave in it and what you do with the things you hear is another thing...!

Do you use it in your business activity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Peter Pan &#8211; all the various applications you mentioned are variants of the same channel. Take the analogy with traditional media, then perhaps Twitter is a postcard, LinkedIn is a memo or business card, Facebook your photo album or social diary and blogging is writing a letter or a book&#8230;</p>
<p>I would say that it&#8217;s never too late to get started, the challenge is where to begin! It must be pretty confusing to jump straight in to social media today without a guide to help. Tools like Tweet Deck can help you keep track, but where do you start &#8211; and what are you trying to achieve by starting off?</p>
<p>The business applications for social media, in my opinion, have yet to be fully explored, understood and the protocols established and whilst they are in this period of development, millions of people are using it and their views influence others in making choices about all kinds of things from politics to product choice.</p>
<p>Seems to me that until a brand or organisation has a real understanding of what&#8217;s being said in these conversations that they&#8217;re ignoring a significant and growing part of their customer base.</p>
<p>In the motor industry the world&#8217;s number two company General Motors has now devoted considerable resource in this area <a href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-keeping-customers-happy-through-social-media-monitoring.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-keeping-customers-happy-through-social-media-monitoring.html</a></p>
<p>Social media is a free-form, open space. How you behave in it and what you do with the things you hear is another thing&#8230;!</p>
<p>Do you use it in your business activity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Media – a tale of the pub, Donald Rumsfeld and the Mexican Wave… by Peter Pan</title>
		<link>http://www.alclarke.com/2010/03/social-media-%e2%80%93-a-tale-of-the-pub-donald-rumsfeld-and-the-mexican-wave/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Pan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 11:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alclarkeltd.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Very good...interesting comments and view.

So what is the difference between your blog, twitter, facebook, myspace you tube and your linked in account??? what about the different technology needed to access these apps, both mobile and static???

With Facebook and all the other usual suspects, is it now not a bit late to jump on this bandwagon, should we not be heading in a different direction now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good&#8230;interesting comments and view.</p>
<p>So what is the difference between your blog, twitter, facebook, myspace you tube and your linked in account??? what about the different technology needed to access these apps, both mobile and static???</p>
<p>With Facebook and all the other usual suspects, is it now not a bit late to jump on this bandwagon, should we not be heading in a different direction now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

